About Me

My photo
" 'Obsessive thinking will eventually wear a hole in your mind' --Michael Lipsey. Word. My brains like swiss cheese." -C. K. Shannon

Tuesday 28 February 2012

So Much Dilemma!

Again in this segment we see so much of Pollan’s humanness as he fully explores “The Omnivores Dilemma”, literally. He approaches the challenge of foraging his own food with such relatability, acknowledging the craziness of this attempt and process of living out what we see now as a “form of play”. But nonetheless, he prevails with such charm, his descriptions give the ideas of hunting and gathering such a good energy, and enstill in them a meditative and enlightening process that is appealing to the reader.

Pollan’s memory of “The Perfect Meal” is heart warming, and reminiscent of other circumstances of cooking where the labor put in reaps the warmth and pleasure of the experience. But for Pollan it means more- it means seeing the meal through from start to finish.

Pollan’s experience not only in the process of shaping and procuring his meal, but also in the process of serving the meal presents an additional Omnivore’s Dilemma around the food we choose to eat each day: that of the long-steamed effort and thought and diligence to make the meal perfect, to cook and to procure. His measurement of “worth” in this meal is idealistic. Of course his foraged meal would not be possible for every dinnertime in the midst of the real world, but what if it had to be? So much of this section for me was reminiscent of Little House on the Prairie, or other older tales where mealtime was dependent on Pa’s success hunting.

This is one of the strongest dilemma’s of modern day life, where procuring food does not have to be a priority because food has become about efficiency and convenience. To what extent do we prioritize our food? As the most basic element of our lives, food deserves this central focus. But this seems ridiculous to think about how much reprioritizing we would have to do to put so much focus on our food. Reading about Pollan’s recipe dilemmas, meticulous schedule for the day of the meal, and worries over insignificant elements of the experience such as a group dynamic reminded me of the meal that I cooked for my housemates for our personal essay assignment where I felt many similarities in our meal process. I faced many of the same situations- my entire week and much of my emotional energy was consumed by the meal.

Even though I would not attempt this every day, and I’m sure Pollan wouldn’t either, there is something magical about the Pollan’s words that “all the words, and memories and stories in which the meal had marinated gave it much of its savor” (408). In this sense food and our experience with food transports us in the idea that it brings us along, food holds stagnant in time all of the bits and pieces of the journey. In this sense, food holds large worth and significance.

Monday 27 February 2012

Long John Slivers?

Long John Silvers is a friendly beacon to its competitors, standing proud in a block of Texas Corall, Wendys and Burger King on one of the highways most frequented by college students in Kalamazoo. The blinding lights of fast food and tall signs speak the language of competition. Long John Silver’s yellow roof stands tall with a bright blue on yellow nautical font trying a bit too hard to lure in the Michigan, land-locked “sailors” looking for their fresh catch.

Although clearly intended for road tripping with its drive-through convenience, Long John Silvers is appropriately priced and accessible to fast-food seeking college students. With such convenience and charm, it is disappointing to find that the food is repulsively greasy for its nearby competitors, outweighing any other worthy elements of the experience.

Entering the restaurant, the familiar aroma of a fast food ambiance is overwhelming. The interior is a laughable effort of authentic. The wallpaper is nothing short of Sponge-bob Squarepants corniness. The walls exhibit scenic beach-town murals, and booths banner-ize the names of various seafood restaurants around the country, trying to channel their charm into the seriously lacking and cheaply furnished restaurant. Any attempt at authenticity is completely undermined by the filthy, crumb-covered floor of conventional brick… slightly reminiscent of Academy St. Though trying to capture a thematic scene, these efforts strike much louder beat than expected fast-food décor, inviting ridicule.

Cleanliness is one universal quality in an eating facility that is noticed by any patron, and Long John Silvers did not impress. In addition to the floor, there are crumbs on many of the tables and condiment countertops, inviting patrons to visualize the messes that were made by others earlier in the day.

Four of eighteen tables were occupied at dinnertime on a Monday night, somewhat justified by the occasional “woosh” of a car coming around the corner in the Drive-Thru line. The sit-down patrons consist of an eclectic group of senior citizens, eating their meals in silence, left to listen to the workers chatting over the exhaust fan and snap crackle pop of frying oil.

Diners come to Long John Silvers for fast food, and certainly get “Fast Food”. The food at Long John Silvers leaves its patrons dripping with grease, and smelling like the fried crust that encases every menu item, both hands and clothing fabric penetrated by the stench. This is memorable, but by no means pleasant. It will take several hours to eliminate evidence of this one minute and forty-five second prep time eating experience.

Friendly servers with headsets robotically chirp the specials to anyone who arrives at the counter, welcoming regulars into their familiar ordering routine. Every menu item is under $8.00. The menu is well designed, offering neat packages of a “meal” or “basket combo” including soup, grilled fish, chicken nuggets, shrimp, and fish tacos with a variety of sides. As one would expect, there are fries, and a soda fountain, but a very limited selection of desserts: three kinds of pie: pecan, pineapple, and chocolate cream.

Fish baskets include deep-fried triangles of Alaskan Pollack, and the new special, Fried Cod. The Pollack is much too thin for the mass of fried-ness on the outside: it oozes with grease when bitten into. The cod is far more substantial, though still far from enjoyable. After eating the first half of each, picking the fish out of the middle fried part is recommended to avoid major heath problems. “Hush Puppies” came as an added bonus with the baskets: a tasteless dry ball of onion flavored styrofoam.

The Fish Taco for ninety-nine cents aligns with its monetary value. The fish is virtually nonexistent, presenting the taco as an artful combination of warm, limp grater sized lettuce shreds, a dry tortilla and some sort of crunchy fried consistency surrounded by a mysterious pink and unnecessarily spicy sauce.

Of the pies, the Chocolate Cream Pie will send one’s stomach from queasy to convulsing. The forty-six (yes forty six) ingredients are hidden on the back of the box while the nutrition facts are on the underside. On first appearance, the pie is mysteriously moist, with condensation on the shavings of chocolate that garnished the top of a whipped brown custard on a thin chocolate crust. The crust is like Betty Crocker mix amped up in sweetness, leaving taste buds crawling with the unpleasantness of fake sugar overload. The inner custard is bearable, but still blister causing.

Possibly the most cause for concern, as every other fast food restaurant seems to have mastered these staple items, are the staples of French Fries and water. The water tastes like mountain-dew out of the soda machine, and the fries, usually the most redeeming and familiarly comforting aspect of a fast food meal, are disappointingly sub-par. The serving sizes are small, as the fries are served with a main dish, and the ketchup cups are tuna-can shaped, wider than they are tall. This makes for awkward dipping of the fries, an unnecessarily unpleasant experience with something so familiar.

Long John Silvers asks for comparison to other fast food competitors, and asks for an unimpressive status. Its incapability to adopt the art of fast food, especially with the fries, suggests students to stick to other frequented cheap joints on the weekends. The food is produced cheap, tastes cheap, and leaves one feeling worse than cheap. On the way out patrons are given the opportunity to “Ring the Captain’s Bell if we did well!”- Just keep on walking.


Sunday 26 February 2012

Food Justice doesn't Just mean Food

I don't know how you all reacted to the "Big" news, but in my eyes, it holds incredible promise for our college campus in many realms. Here's an index article to jog your memory about campus reactions to the news.

But how does Social Justice pertain to food? Especially here? Here is a concise definition of Food Justice to spark our conversation. It really is true that food affects everyone. Not only that, but because eating includes taking part in a larger system (as Pollan has shown us) the way we eat and use our purchasing power has enormous impact on the broader community.

Large corporation food spending seems contradictory to Food Justice, because much of large corporation spending is synonymous with cutting ethical corners in order to increase profit. But thinking about the purchasing power of these corporations, they have incredible potential to influence the broader system by redirecting their spending. For example, Bon Apetit management company issued a CIW agreement that used their purchasing power to demand better working conditions for farm labor. But Farm Worker rights deal with only one aspect of Food Justice.

There are ZERO grocery stores in the 49006 zip code (our zipcode, which includes the Northside neighborhood) and only one grocery store in zipcode 49007 (The Park st. Market). What does this mean for families making minimum wage and working maximal hours every week? It means shopping at convenience stores because of lack of time and energy to take the bus all the way to a real grocery store. Imagine if we didn't have the caf... we have Munchie Mart, but getting to Meijer on the bus takes like 1.5 hours round trip not including shopping time. If we can imagine shopping at Munchie Mart for 3 meals a day, it may help us to understand one reason for health decline in low income neighborhoods. Families who do not have health insurance are often the ones who have no access to food, making their lifetime even more expensive because of the long term affects of what they have access to. The Fair Food Network is an organization dedicated to addressing these issues.

Buying "Local" and "organic" foods is often seen as elitist or expensive. But do these words hold the broader implications of Food Justice in practice? Just, Local and Sustainable food all work towards a common goal: to boost the local economy in order to create a more cohesive system for all, and to support farms that don't exploit farmworkers.

Does our Social Justice work on campus have a space to rally around these issues? Could we do it through out dining service provider?

Sorry that was long... don't worry if you can't look at it all, we can go over it in discussion :)

Thursday 23 February 2012

Michael Pollen Feels Like My New Best Friend


Pollen’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma is charming to nearly everyone who reads it. He has a way of capturing people such as Joel Salatin that just make you want to meet them! His descriptions of his time on the farm and the activities there were charismatic, and he very craftily inserted segments about the industrial organic system into his experience in the context of the time he was spending on Polyface. Reading Pollens books helps me to forecast my own conversations that I have about similar issues and how to incorporate important and telling details such as the ones he presents about Industrial Organic Farms. His tone is so conversational but yet so vivid and convincing, truly painting a picture of the food system for the reader’s own interpretation. He offers his own encounters and experiences as information for others to make conclusions, though his words have an incredible persuasive undercurrent.
            His comparison of pastoral and industrial farms is unbiased, yet illustrates the vast difference between the two. He anticipates the reader’s encounter with the text through his translations of his own encounters with the farms. His language of experience is appropriate for an audience who engages in his thought process virtually: in the context of his experience. Pollen embarks on a journey of his own thoughts and opinions in relation the ideas of others, responding to Salatin’s opinion  with curiosity, yet determination to make his own analysis: “Salatin was convinced that industrial organic was finally a contradiction in terms. I decided I had to find out if he was right” (133). Pollen presents food as just food, and farming methods as just farming methods, he does not preconceive anything “good” or “bad” about the broad spectrum of ideals and methods until he fully explores the pros and cons of each and analyzes the repercussions in the system in both short and long-term contexts.
            Pollen’s craft presents effective language and technique for talking about food and food systems. As someone who engages in these conversations on a daily basis, the hardest part is often framing agriculture methods so that people can make their own revelations through a non goal-oriented context. Pollen achieves this in this second section, perhaps most effectively because his goal is universal: to learn about food origin. His discussion of Industrial Organic is particularly effective because he engages the reader not only as a reader but as a consumer, furthering the relatability of his experience: “Yet the organic label itself… is really just an imperfect substitute for direct observation of how a food is produced, a concession to the reality that most people in an industrial society haven’t the time or inclination to follow their food back to the farm… its existence is an industrial artifact” (137). This myth busting approach grabs the reader’s attention by identifying the rest of the population as “most people”, distinguishing the reader as someone who is choosing to further their knowledge of food. After drawing attention to the difference between the illusion and the reality, he further deepens the thought process of the reader, elaborating on the disillusionment of the charm of industrial “organic” food, describing Supermarket Pastoral as a “a most seductive literary form”, increasing the victimization of the reader to this seduction.
            There is so much to discuss in this book, but I am especially impressed with Pollen’s strategy in his writing to be incredibly relatable, and introduce each concept by building a relatable relationship between himself and the reader.

Wednesday 22 February 2012

FOOD at K!

Hello food-obsessed friends, this is a little preview to my choose your own adventure discussion, but I wanted to make you aware of something that very specifically pertains to each of you:

WE NEED YOU in the food movement that is starting on our campus. How do YOU feel about the caf? What do you want to change in it? nothing? everything? Did you know we are opening our food service contract up for bid for the first time in 43 YEARS this spring/summer/fall? This means that by this time next year, the college will have a new contract with a food service provider... it could be sodexo, and it could not. Do you care about who it is? We have a big say in how this goes down, so we need everyone to participate.

We need students on this campus to rally around food and what we want to see in this new bidding process. Because we are already food-minded students on campus, we need to start conversations, and get your friends thinking about food too. Talk about food, and sodexo with everyone you know, and get them thinking about how they feel about the food they eat in the caf. the encourage them to come to the StuComm forum, info below.

There are also a few specific times that we need YOUR help so that we can come together as a student body and have representation from students are thinking about food! The first is tomorrow night from 5-7 PM in the caf, we will be going around to different tables and just getting people talking about food. We need you to come and talk to people!!! If you want to help with this, please come to a prep meeting tonight at 6PM in the service-learning room on the first floor of Dewing (102a). If you can't come to the prep meeting tonight, but want to help tomorrow, meet at 4:45 on the landing outside the caf tomorrow before dinner hours start for a quick briefing.

BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, WE NEED YOUR VOICE ON TUESDAY AT 5PM IN THE HARMON LOUNGE FOR A STUCOMM FORUM SURROUNDING FOOD ON CAMPUS! This conversation will be directly with the administration, and we cannot pass up this opportunity to show them that a large number of students care about the food we are eating. This campus is small enough that EVERYONE matters, so please please come.

I know people probably have questions and ideas, so we can talk about it on Tuesday, or feel free to email me.

Thanks so much, we hope to hear you talking... you can make a difference!
Charlotte :)

Tuesday 21 February 2012

Corn!


            I love this book. I think Pollen uses the perfect amount of rhetoric, humor, and just plain fact combined to illustrate our food system, something we don’t think to question, in an unbiased tone which does not fail to paint the picture of the frightening reality.
            Part One offers a very telling look at industrial agriculture, and to me, makes our food system (or corn system) seem ridiculous. It is helpful to look at corn through the lens of commodification and how corn functions in the economic market. Pollen states that ultimately we end up finding uses for corn because the ”supply of corn vastly exceeds the demand”, and our roll is to put it all to use.
            This mass of corn land in itself presents irony: corn overwhelms the production of any other food in the areas where is produced on the largest of scales, introducing the term “food desert” in the context of Iowa, who, in practice, produces more “food” per acre than so many other places. This concept is incredibly paradoxical because the “food” coming from Iowa is not sustainable, and is shipped away to be processed, engineered, or fed to animals.
            To further the contradiction of corn, corn sells for cheaper than is costs to produce? As Naylor analyzes, agriculture does not work well in a free market: there will never be sudden increases in demands for food when prices are low. This causes farmers to make additional budget cuts in order to increase their overall revenue, and the government to subsidize the product in order to further encourage production. Furthermore, to drive this picture of our enormous corn production industry home, Pollen was unable to trace the corn product to our plates. To me, the image represents the function of corn, rather than the magic of food through the collaboration and interaction it provokes between producer and consumer.
            To look at meat, a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation says it all. Being introduced to an animal and the “adaptation” it experiences to be raised on feed. Corn has become the definition of cheap: there is a ton of it, it doesn’t cost much, and it is used for efficiency, “offer[ing] the cheapest calories” (68). Raising beef also presents the contradiction of immediate efficiency versus long-term sustainability. Yes the grain feed cycles provide the most efficient lifespan for timely and consumer-satisfying meat production, but grass-fed meat is much more sustainable and energy efficient.
            Not to mention that all of this translates into humans weather through meat of through processed foods, so much of what we eat is filled with corn. Based on the examples Pollen gave, I can only imagine how much corn someone on an
“American” diet is eating, someone like Bich! It is crazy to think about our appetites as something that has been affected so much by the food industry, providing many more opportunities to contribute to the consumer driven industry. To trace it all to a McDonalds meal was very climactic, smething that represents the larger implications of all of the pieces of the meal along the way.
            Reading the first section through the lens of my personal biases caused many reactions such as these. But in reality, I understand the economic logic and sense that this system makes from a money-making standpoint. These farmers are just trying to build a business. But in my eyes, I see it at the expense of so many other resources. “Industrial logic” really does make sense, it’s just not something I believe in.

Monday 13 February 2012

Long John Slivers?


Long John Silvers stands bright in its yellow scheme of sunshine happiness smacked in a strips of Texas Corall, Wendys and Burger Kind on one of the ugliest strip mall highways in Kalamazoo. The blinding lights of fast food and tall signs speak the language of competition. Long John Silver’s yellow roof stands tall like a beacon with a bright blue on yellow nautical font trying a bit too hard to lure the nonexistent land-locked sailors looking for their fresh catch to be diminished to a fried crust. The parking lot is pretty empty on a Monday night, with the occasional car that comes around the drive through corner.

The parking lot is designed around the drive thru. “Seniors, 20% off very Tuesday” hangs in the window in appropriately big font. Entering the restaurant, tall booth backs and barriers make navigating to the counter mysterious and somewhat disorienting. The immediate stench of a McDonalds fast food ambiance is overwhelming.

The interior of the restaurant is a laughable effort of authentic. The wallpaper is nothing short of Sponge-bob Squarepants corniness. The walls exhibit scenic beach-town murals. Booths banner-ize the names of various seafood restaurants around the country, trying to channel their charm into the seriously lacking and cheaply furnished 40x40 foot “restaurant”. Any attempt at authenticity is completely undermined by the filthy, crumb-covered floor of conventional brick… slightly reminiscent of Academy St.

Friendly servers with headsets robotically chirp their elevator speech to anyone who arrives at the counter, and wink when they spot a customer a discount. Every menu item is under $8.00… even the “meals”. If one chooses to think through the content of the food served at these prices, they would realize none of the menu items are worth nearly this much. The menu is well advertised, everything offered tying up into a neat little package of a “meal” or “basket combo”. A range of soup, grilled fish, chicken nuggets, shrimp, and fish tacos can be found on the menu, along with a variety of sides. There is virtually nothing green to be ordered, except for fried veggie bites and processed, lumpy slimy green beans. Of course there are fries, and drinks, but a very limited selection of desserts: three kinds of pie- pecan, pineapple, and chocolate cream.

Four of eighteen tables were occupied at dinnertime on a Monday night, somewhat justified by the occasional woosh of a car coming around the corner in the drive thru line. The sit-down patrons consist of an eclectic group of senior citizens, eating their meals in silence left to listen to the workers behind the counter argue about who appreciates the other more over the exhaust fan and snap crackle pop of frying oil.

The food at Long John Silvers leaves its patrons with the headache and pounding chest that precedes a heart attack. This is memorable, but by no means pleasant, the concern for one’s health completely overriding any other redeeming impressions of the establishment. It will take several hours to recover from this one minute and forty-five second prep time eating experience. It was evident the manager had not worked out courteous table serving etiquette as the food was delivered without cutlery, causing customers to make a trip to the counter regardless.


Fish baskets include shapeless triangles of Alaskan Pollack, and the new special, fried Cod. The Pollack was much too thin for the mass of fried-ness on the outside, it oozed with grease when squeezed. The cod was far more substantial, though still far from impressive. After eating the first half of each, picking the fish out of the middle fried part is recommended to avoid major heath problems. Hush Puppies came as an added bonus with the baskets, a tasteless dry ball of onion flavored styrofoam.

The Fish Taco for ninety-nine cents aligned with its monetary value. The fish was virtually nonexistent, presenting the taco was an artful combination of warm, limp grater sized lettuce shreds, a dry tortilla and some sort of crunchy fried consistency surrounded by a mysterious pink and unnecessarily spicy sauce.

Of the pies, the Chocolate Cream pie will send one’s stomach from queasy to convulsing. The forty-six (yes forty six) ingredients are hidden on the back of the box while the nutrition facts are slapped on the underside. Judging from its presentation in a box with “pull here” tabs like Philadelphia cream cheese, it would be safe to bet the “pie” has been in this condition for at least a week. On first appearance it is mysteriously moist, with condensation on the shavings of chocolate that garnished the top. It was whipped brown custard on a thin chocolate crust. The crust was Betty Crocker mix on Steroids, leaving taste buds crawling with the unpleasantness of fake sugar overload. The inner custard was bearable, but still blister causing.

The food items with the least potential for disaster should be of the most concern. The water tastes like mountain-dew out of the soda machine, and the fries, usually the most redeeming quality of a fast food meal, were sub-par. The serving size was disappointing, and the ketchup cups were tuna-can shaped, wider than they were tall. This made for awkward dipping of the fries, an unnecessarily unpleasant experience of something so familiar.

Disposal of the entire meal was the most doomful, as everything once on the tray of a single serving of food gets dumped into a landfill. Not even the personal follow through of cleaning the dishes graced this below disappointing atmosphere and food quality. Long John Silvers rings cheap, with each patron just another open mouth on the conveyer belt of the past food industry. The food is produced cheap, tastes cheap, and leaves one feeling worse than cheap.

On the way out patrons are given the opportunity to “Ring the Captain’s Bell if we did well!”- Just keep on walking.

Do I have to go to Long John Silvers?


            Who would ever go to a surf-shack style over-the-counter fish stick serving fast food joint in the middle of Michigan? My perception of Long John Silvers is probably clouded by my dedication to health and the local food system, which is why I for-see this experience to be an incredibly mediocre one for me, and I hope it will shed some light upon the mindset of so many fast-food obsessed junkies that we sit in class and analyze every day. Never having entered the building, it seems impossible that the cabana-sized beach shack holds a substantial kitchen and adequate seating.
            I hope there won’t be too many rowdy kids, and I certainly hope their Hansel and Gretel crumbs won’t be strewn across all of the tables and out the door. Though not a germ –a-phobe, I appreciate an appropriately sanitized dining experience. I’m sure the plastic booths will have that mysterious slimy coating on the top, and I’m sure the tables will be either just too high or just too low for the fixed benches. I bet the bathrooms will look like the ones I use in a rapid rush on pit-stops, those with toilet seat covers.
Reading their mission statement on the website with a permanently critical eye, trying to de-code statements such as “all natural” was not helpful. Their fisherman “cast their nets in the best waters on earth”- try farm-raising fish tanks in rural Iowa. Maybe an open mind will be all it will take to taste the glory and impressiveness of their “We speak fish” motto.
            If nothing else, the fries should impress. Fish and Chips? Fast food? Road Trip pit-stop? These joints, including McDonald’s always have perfectly cut, genetically modified, conveyer belt, uniform, greasy but unmatchable fries. I’m not a health freak, I enjoy my fair share of junk food, but can’t eat it without a deep-frier’s worth of guilt. I’m also hoping for some kind of frostie or ice cream dessert situation. It would appear that Long John Silver’s would strive to complete “the meal” like so many other grab-and-go restaurants… a Cod-olate shake, perhaps? A Reef Beer float?
            I’m sure the thematic elements of seafood will be played to the max, I wouldn’t be surprised if the musical ambiance was set with a sponge-bob square pants sound track...“Aye, Aye Captain”. Corniness could be a real tool here, to lure kids into begging their parents to bring them back to the cheap, fake, heart-attack-in-a-basket place. Mascots? Kids Meals? TV’s playing the Little Mermaid? Who knows.
            I expect to be surrounded by people I wouldn’t normally share a meal with, to eat very mediocre and terrifyingly fake fried “seafood”, to try what I order, and resort to eating the fries and ice cream (hopefully). Fries and ice cream aren’t so bad, but I could go anywhere for those. So, Long John Silvers, impress me with your fish-speaking abilities.

Thursday 9 February 2012

Crossing to Another Side of the Foodway


This article blew my mind. It was like everything I have ever unsuccessfully tried to say about food verbalized in perfect eloquence. I love the anthropological approach in the exploration of food in anthropological tourism. This perspective shed new light on both food and tourism for me, and how each are often victimized by social constructions.
            Additionally, learning about the concept of a “foodway” was particularly insightful. These sections labeled aspects of food that we talk about each day and identified them as one unified, concrete concept: “the network of behaviors, traditions, and beliefs concerning food… and the activities surrounding a food item and its consumption, including the procurement, preservation, preparation, presentation, and performance of that food” (8). It is this idea that makes eating an experience, and a lens through which a person can see and the diversity of ways that a person can interact with culture and food. The concept of “otherness” also framed so many aspects of familiar elements of food and food systems to mean something so much broader and more telling about society and culture.
For example, “otherness” of region is something that I can completely identify with coming away from my days of feeling like a new foodie in Michigan. Not only do certain food items and the cultures they cultivate characterize certain areas and the people that live there, but they are also a part of our unified identification as a greater nation with individual histories. Michigan is certainly a microcosm for this concept with Cherries in Travcrse City, asparagus in Oceana County, and those hot pastry cakes that I can’t remember the name of in the UP. These foods shape the natural environment of each of these areas, and thus the culture and society surrounding and interacting with these foods. Similarly, I identified with the shift in perspective that comes when “an individual physically changes location and finds his or herself loving within a new foodways system” (35). This statement applies to shifting from urban to rural experiences, changes between cities with more prominent ethnicities, regions of the country, neighborhood access, and many other complex geographical and personality elements of food and place.

Finally, reading about Thai food experiences in the United Stated caused me to think about my own patronage of Thai restaurants, and the reasons behind my yearning for the authenticity or flavor of the food, or combination of each. In a way, becoming literate about the idea of authenticity has ruined that illusion for me, and infiltrated the way I will always think about foreign food experiences in a local culture. I was struck by one of the observations made from the study that “encounter with the other is needed to bring the tourist’s own cultural identity into better focus” (66). Initially, I perceived this statement to completely deface the idea of cross-cultural interaction through food. However, it is the yearning for an “exotic” and “authentic experience” that lends distance, and therefore differentiation to these experiences, which is especially believable and even relatable in the context of experiencing food of another culture in American restaurants.

Monday 6 February 2012

The Cheese

The summer between my Freshman and Sophomore years of high school, my super-cool, new-parent cousins Jenna and Wilson from Santa Fe, New Mexico brought me with them on a European vacation as their babysitter for 15 month old Jack. I looked up to them both, and was incredibly flattered that they trusted me with baby Jack and wanted to spend over two weeks with me. Jenna was the epitome of a cool mom: a bilingual schoolteacher, and wore dresses and skirts almost every day with stylish sunglasses and had absolutely no sign of post-pregnancy weight gain. Wilson owned an up and coming photography gallery in Santa Fe. They were in the process of building a gorgeous house on the top of the hill where they would raise their beautiful family. I wanted to fit into their dream life.
We flew business class to London, and from there, visited Spain, Paris, and Corsica. It was quite luxurious: our accommodations were splendid, and of course we were well fed. I couldn’t help but feel as though my fifteen-year-old palate was a bit underdeveloped to be launching on such a sophisticated and globally renowned food experience. Jenna and Wilson were incredibly hospitable. Although I was merely the babysitter, they were equally invested in my experience. They paid for my entry into every museum, and watched Jack while I had a chance to browse the art. It was quite a dream come true, and made me want to live up to their generosity, and prove it was worth it for them to bring me along.
Over our first few days in Paris we went to a fresh food market. There were dozens of carts in close proximity lining a nearby park, all with dried hanging meats, handmade soaps, bits of clothing, and of course, cheese. Each cart owner was authentically dressed and crazed with the pace of the market, handing out food right and left to needy customers. We approached the cheese cart half cringing and half salivating over the mixed stinky scents of waxed rinds and the delicacies that they encased. While Jenna and Wilson thoughtfully tasted extensively aged and complex cheeses, a small round of provolone style cheese coated in herbs caught my eye. It looked organic and spry piled on top of many other yellowish blistering cheeses. I asked the person in plastic gloves to shave me a sliver, and melted with pleasure. It was like string cheese: simple and creamy, the essence of “dairy” but salty and chewy, with substance.
I don’t remember my exact outward reaction to the cheese, but it caused my cousins to earnestly fixate on supplying what they perceived to be my obsession for the rest of the trip. As soon as my first wheel ran out, they pioneered nearby markets to find another one. I have memories of the cheese on my breakfast plate every morning, in plastic baggies for midday snacks, and as a substitute for any cheese ingredient in any recipe we tried. The cheese came to represent their understanding of me, that something small could make me so incredibly elated, and that they could facilitate that by providing it for me. I also couldn’t help but feel innocent and childish by what I thought they saw as my immature fetish, and comfort food. If anything, I had hoped to fixate on something more sophisticated and impressive.
Our final cheese purchase was made only just a few days before we left. Jenna was predictably enthusiastic about her discovery of “the cheese” at a different market and insisted that I bring home an additional round as a souvenir. We left with two large rounds of cheese: one for me to eat over the next three days, and the other vacuum sealed so as to escape the drug dogs at customs. As the passing days decreased our cheese eating time, the chunks of cheese with each meal became larger and larger. We also decided just before leaving that it was a bad idea to bring the cheese through customs, dividing the entire thing at our last meal. The cheese became a challenge, an obstacle, and I eventually became very reluctant to eat it.
The cheese was the love of my life, and very soon after, the bane of my existence. It was a fixation that slowly turned to an aversion. Such conflicting feelings over the cheese lead to an all time low of my repulsion against it. We had a parabolic relationship, starting with an erotic obsession that was slowly overwhelmed by much too large amounts of the sticky, milky dairy. This slowly morphed into a loathing, but then in its absence, after months had gone by, worked back up to a craving and desire for the initial memories of the cheese.
I really do remember the initial magic of the cheese and long for it, I even salivate when thinking about the salty, creamy, garnished delicacy and fortunately, that is what has stuck with me through the entire conflicting relationship. This summer my family and I visited the Plaza Hotel in New York City, and browsed the newly constructed food hall. Gazing into the glass casing at the cheese counter, my heart skipped a beat as I saw a similarly sized wheel of herb-covered cheese, and immediately blabbed my association with it to a confused lady behind the glass who gave me a sample, but it wasn’t the same. I don’t even know if my memory of the cheese is accurate anymore. Between memories both of pure pleasure and repulsion, the hypothetical taste in my mouth could be completely inaccurate. It’s a taste that will never return to me unless it is in my mouth. Whenever I see a wheel of herb covered cheese at market, I will always ask for a small shaving off the top, not because I desperately crave the cheese, but just to see if it is the same as the one I know so well. Until then, I will be left feeling unresolved.

Thursday 2 February 2012

Charm: A Secret Ingredient



            I very much enjoy our readings in Secret Ingredients… I find the voices of the New Yorker writers to be eloquent with so much personality and charisma. Many of the stories made me smile, and even laugh out loud. It was great to revisit Tony Bourdain and read something from his “insider” chef perspective… I would imagine “Don’t Eat Before Reading This” is an example of the truths that come out in his book Kitchen Confidential? Andres? Additionally, reading “Is There a Crisis in French Cooking?” reminded me of on of Bourdain’s adventures in A Cook’s Tour, structured similarly, with a sub focus on alcohol ;)
            My favorite of today’s stories was “Good Cooking”. I’m realizing I am such a sucker for Julia Child’s charm and character, and thinking about cooking my meal for our third writing piece out of her cookbook! Thinking about this as I read, I wonder how can I have the most authentic and dramatic “Julia Child” experience possible? This story gave me some ideas. The movie also really shaped the way I read this story because I couldn’t help but hear the voice of Meryl Streep in my head during the dialogue. Both the movie and “Good Cooking” depict Julia as a fearless leader of housewives, and a diligent teacher who strives to communicate every detail, and the reason behind every procedure in every recipe.  And she does it with such style! Pearls, heels, a classy apron, and she dances through the kitchen, puttering over this or that, and finding humor in each of her mistakes. Julia’s sympathy for humanity and earnest yearning to be a diligent teacher is art of what makes her so endearing, and this certainly came through in the reading: “The purpose of their book was to overcome the American fear of “elaborate” French cuisine… leave[ing] nothing out, describe[ing] for example, what each dish should look like and feel like at each stage in its preparation, and also to discuss some of the things that could go wrong” (134). Julia is a “myth buster”, guiding aspiring American housewives to achieve their own greatness, and these priorities are telling of her passion for food and French cooking. Julia is so real, illustrating to her reader, viewers, and students that it takes a process and journey of learning through mistakes as she herself makes them on the show, becoming “furious” when the camera man cut the action during a fire crises because she wanted to show her viewers how to handle these things. Although I have never seen her show, I can sense from every word of description from this story that it is unbearably tickling. Described by her husband as “‘a natural ham’” Julia commands the kitchen, and is an inspiration of others in her following to do just the same. Julia’s personality defines her relationship with food, and helps others to feel closer to it as well. I hope I can grow closer to Julia and her endearing ways throughout my cooking career!